Finance and Operations come at procurement from opposite ends. RiskOpex gives them a single framework: the same financial terms, set before the decision and on record after.
Present the case in terms Finance and Operations understand and support.
The job is taking the right risks, managing uncertainty and being able to measure the benefits.
The right outcome for your team, justified.
Decisions based on the whole business and bottom line, not limited to a silo.
Consistent decisions quantifying uncertainty, across sites and teams, in one framework.
A clear financial picture of control cost effectiveness.
Three real examples, re-modelled with public data.
| Keep the de-rate | Restore OEM spec | |
|---|---|---|
| Certain each year | $250M revenue forgone | $5M extra wear |
| At risk each year | — | $3.75M 5 faults, expected |
| Worst plausible year | — | $13M 11 faults, 1-in-100 |
| Net average vs today | — | $241M a year better |
| Standard, on-site IT | HA, remote support | HA, specialists on site | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Certain each year | $242K | $669K | $969K |
| Everyday outages what the case was argued on | $20K 6 a year | $2K cut to 0.5 a year | $2K cut to 0.5 a year |
| The freeze what decides it | $5M 1-in-200 | $10M 1-in-100, doubled | $5M 1-in-200 |
| All-in each year | $5.2M | $10.7M | $6M |
Is that even the question?
| CrowdStrike, list | CrowdStrike, 50% off | Microsoft, EDR all | Microsoft, no EDR 1,500 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Certain each year | $500K | $336K | $275K | $181K |
| At risk each year | $245K | $245K | $260K | $403K |
| Worst plausible year | $2M breach 1-in-30 + $750K outage 1-in-30 | $2M breach 1-in-30 + $750K outage 1-in-30 | $2M breach 1-in-30 | $12.5M breach 1-in-60 |
| Net vs today | — | $164K better | $210K better | $161K better |
Box-ticking doesn't protect the business. Here is what risk management looks like when it isn't doing its job:
Same risk, a different answer site to site
A grid of colours won't tell you what to do
Real money committed, no proof it was the right call